Guest Post: Paul Michael Durivage
“Fix the pacing” can sit attached to a manuscript for weeks. It sounds like a corrective task, but it leaves the writer to work out what the instruction specifically entails. A revision file can often contain dozens of notes like that.
Some identify problems. Some suggest solutions. Others record ideas worth trying. Treating them all as generic instructions makes a revision harder to control.
Before changing the draft, give each note greater clarity by assigning one of three labels: question, decision, or experiment.
Question: What needs an answer?
Suppose a reader ponders, “Why doesn’t she open the envelope?” You may know the answer, but the page may not supply it. Or you may discover that the character has no convincing reason to wait.
Turn the comment into a question you can check against the text: “Does the reader understand what she risks by opening the envelope?” Read the scene for that one thing. If the risk is already clear, the problem may lie elsewhere. If it is missing, you have found something specific to develop. Assess and apply accordingly.
Decision: What have you chosen to change?
Once you understand the problem and select a repair, write the action plainly: “Remove the second explanation of why the letter matters.”
That is a decision you can carry out and then check. It also records the extent of the change. You have chosen to remove a repetition, not to cut every reference to the letter or rewrite the whole chapter.
Experiment: What might work?
Some suggestions deserve a trial without becoming a permanent revision. Label those as experiments: “Try letting her visitor see the unopened envelope.” Save the current scene, make a separate trial, and read what follows. Does the visitor’s knowledge create a useful new choice? Does it damage a later reveal? You can reject the experiment without deciding that the entire revision has failed.
Keep the result with the note.
After reviewing a corrective comment, add a short outcome: answered, changed, or tried and set aside. Include one sentence explaining why, when the reason will be hard to remember later.
This is especially useful when you return to a manuscript after a break. An old suggestion should not become a fresh assignment simply because you forgot that you already tested it.
Try sorting notes before your next revision session. If you cannot tell which label fits, pause long enough to make the note specific. Knowing whether you are investigating, changing, or testing gives the next hour of work a clearer purpose and greater progress.
BIO:
Paul Michael Durivage is a Michigan independent author of horror, speculative fiction, and workplace satire. His background includes more than twenty-five years in precision manufacturing, supervision, and operator training. https://www.paulmichaeldurivage.com/books
Thoughts, readers?
Image credit: Pixabay.com


















.jpg)